VILLAGE BOARD MEETING
7:00
p.m
Paul Beere called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Gary Beck, Chris
Bennett, Ed Chart, Chris Johnson, Bob Lancour, and Mike Weinkauf present.
Sandi Swan, Deputy Clerk-Treasurer; Christopher Birkett, Public Works Manager;
and John Tierney, Engineer; were also present.
Pledge of Allegiance
Minutes. Bennett, moved, 2nd by Johnson to approve the minutes from the February
14, 2011 meeting. Motion carried.
Public Comment.
Weinkauf stated that he asked Robin Vos to talk to the Board regarding the
current issues going on in Madison and how it will affect Rochester.
Robin Vos addressed the Board. He provided a handout to the Board summarizing
some of the issues in the Budget that are being proposed at the state level. He
stated that he received an enormous amount of e-mails from across the country.
After going through them he estimated that he received about 1000 from Racine
County residents. All in all 55% were opposed of the Budget Repair Bill and 45%
were in support. When he went out and actually spoke to people most were in
support. He stated there is definitely organized opposition out there.
He explained that as Chairman of the State Finance Committee, it is his job to
figure out ways to balance the state budget. The Budget Repair Bill is the first
step in balancing the state budget. Both Democrats and Republicans in the past
used less than honest methods in the past such as accounting tricks, using money
from other funds, raising taxes, increased spending, etc. Now they are focusing
on doing it the old fashion way, by looking at what money is coming in and only
spending that amount. In doing that, there will have to be some severe
sacrifices made.
The State spends 85% of their money in five different areas:
· K-12 Education
· Medic-aid
· Shared Revenue
· Property tax relief
· Prisons, UW Systems
With a 3.6 billion dollar deficit, under Obama Care whatever benefits you had
with Medicade, on March 10st 2010, you cannot spend or change the way you pay
for healthcare. The ads that you’ve seen about healthcare, and that the State
will decimate it are a lie because you cannot do it under federal law. All of
the money that comes in to the state over the next two years from sales tax,
income tax, etc is about 1 ½ billion dollars, all that money has to go into
paying healthcare for the poor, because it cannot be changed under Obama Care.
There is no money left after that. That is where the Budget Repair Bill
comes in.
The first step is to require that all public employees pay 5.8% into their
pension and 12.5% (which is half the national average) towards their healthcare
as a goal. Employees that do not have a contract will have to pay 6.5% towards
their pension. This all will take effect April 1, 2011. Elected officials will
pay 6.5% and non-elected employees will pay 5.8%. As, an example, if you make
$50,000 dollars a year you will make $250 a month less because you will be
paying into your pension and healthcare.
The second step is the Budget Repair Bill, under the proposal there will be cuts
in shared revenue and to schools. He stated that the formula that the state will
use to determine those cuts will be different than what was used in the past.
The bigger the municipality the bigger the cuts, for smaller municipalities
where there is not as much savings from the pension and healthcare, those cuts
will be smaller. The savings to the municipalities as a result of employees
paying into the pension and healthcare should cover those cuts. Some schools
will have more money to spend as a result of teachers paying into their pension
and healthcare.
For those schools and municipalities that are already frugal and require their
employees to contribute to their pension and healthcare is something that they
are going to have to take a look at, because the state doesn’t not want to
penalize those that have already been frugal.
The other areas that municipalities are concerned with are the transportation
aids. In the new formula, towns will be the first draw on road aids then it will
go up on a population basis after that. So the big cities will see a larger
reduction in transportation aids as opposed to Rochester who should see a
smaller cut. Final numbers will probably be out by the end of the month and he
would be happy to come back and discuss any specifics in the bill.
Bennett questioned Vos, how does he see this working for Rochester? Rochester
only has three employees and they are not unionized, they do not receive
healthcare benefits and already pay into the pension. Voss agreed that Rochester
is not the best example, but he feels because of the way the formula works he
feels that the impact will be felt much less in Rochester. He doesn’t really
know how this will affect Rochester exactly. That is really something they will
have to look at when they go through the budget process. There will be an
amendment process as well.
Voss stated that the one thing he does oppose in the Budget Repair Bill is
eliminating the recycling mandate, and he will work on getting it changed. He
does know right now that municipalities do get aid for recycling. The way that
the Governor has proposed the bill, everyone will be required to recycle; it
will still be illegal to put it in the garbage; however the resident in the new
bill will have to take it to the dump themselves.
Bennett stated that he was glad to see Voss and is looking forward to seeing how
they will handle the smaller municipalities.
Weinkauf stated that the Village of Rochester has developed a capital
improvement plan that includes roads, fire trucks, new village hall, etc. and it
seems like the state wants municipalities to borrow money. The State doesn’t
want to raise taxes but it seems they are encouraging smaller municipalities to
borrow. He’s wondering if that’s going to get the Village of Rochester into the
same problem that the State of Wisconsin is in.
Voss stated that in the new budget repair bill there is a proposed property tax
freeze, so whatever you pay in property taxes last year; that is what you will
pay in the future. If a municipality has a net increase in construction, i.e.
new construction home, the Village will be able to increase their spending by
what that home will bring in, in property taxes. Municipalities will have the
right to increase their levies through a referendum process.
Johnson stated that he heard a rumor that Badger Care for the farmers will be
dropped. Voss stated that is exactly what it is a rumor. Under the Federal
healthcare bill, Wisconsin, under Governor Doyle, had the most rapid expansion
of healthcare for the poor. Originally medic-aid was for children under five,
under Governor Thompson it was expanded to all children under 18, and then it
was expanded to the mom and then to the dad and now it has been expanded to
anybody. Under the Federal health care bill, starting in July 2013 or 2014 you
are only required to pay up to 133% of poverty. It is technically possible
for Badger Care to be cut back not only for farmers but for families as well.
Badger Care is 100% state funded. There are about 60,000 people in the program
right now and they will stay in it as long as they need it. However, Governor
Walker wants to put a cap on it so as the numbers come down, they will only let
people into it that absolutely need it.
Vos stated as more information comes out he will be happy to come back and talk
to the Board at that time to see exactly how this will affect Rochester and what
he can do to help.
Department Reports:
Rochester Volunteer Fire & Rescue. Fire Chief, Tim Dahlberg reported ten fire
calls and sixty rescue calls since January.
Sherriff’s Department. Deputy Castillo read a written report showing the
following statistics for February: four accidents; five speeding
citations, zero traffic citation, two parking citations and four warnings were
issued. There was one misdemeanor arrest and one ordinance arrest.
Complaint statistics were as follows: seventeen complaints originated
through calls directly to the Sheriff’s Department; Deputy Castillo assisted
with four additional complaints, originated nineteen on his own and performed
follow up on forty-one. He reported seventeen working days, 154
hours and 1,074 miles driven. Eleven foot patrols were also conducted.
Deputy Castillo also stated that they dealt with a lot of snow. He has a few
animal complaints pending and he will start the spring cleanup compliance as the
weather gets better.
Sgt. William Mattke introduced himself. He stated his work schedule is Monday
through Friday and his hours vary on those days.
Public Works Department. Christopher Birkett’s written report was reviewed as
follows:
Lift Stations/ Sewer: Testing generators and maintenance of lift stations.
Working on sewer maps and organizing televising schedule.
Roads: Working on specs and getting prices for maintenance and repair projects.
Getting back to sign upgrades and brush cutting. Potholes and shoulder touch ups
will be addressed over the next two weeks.
Parks: Will start clean up this month. I should have specs completed and quotes
in for rip rap project. Mowing bids are in and will be on the April agenda.
Animal Control: More calls as weather improves, mostly cats, 1 dog and 1 horse.
Attended animal control meeting in Racine, will report on that later on in the
meeting.
Storm Sewer: Sub-committee continues to meet, I’ve been helping John Tierney
inventorying our storm sewer assets. Committee Members are collecting info on
field tiles.
Engineering Department. Tierney read is reports as follows:
Settlement of Rochester Condominiums – Project Completion: Met with attorney and
Village Clerk to review outstanding work items based on Developer’s Agreement
paragraphs. Obtained letter of acceptance from Racine County for CTH J
turn lane improvements.
Stoneridge sub. Construction Services – Requested as-built storm water detention
calculations and storm system topographic information.
Stormwater Feasibility Study – Preparing storm sewer atlas from record drawings.
Field inventory of critical drainage structures. Soliciting information
regarding farm drainage tiles.
2011 Street Improvements – Design obtaining soil boring proposals. Field visits
to measure pavement.
Sanitary Sewer GIS Atlas – Prepared work order for consideration.
Zoning Department. Schattner reported permits issued from January through March
2011 as follows:
Site Plan & Operational Plan Reviews:
a) American Fireworks/Burger King
b) Miller Bros. Partnership
Zoning Permits:
a) Two (2) Storage Sheds
b) Two (2) Storage shed additions
c) Two (2) Residential additions
d) Two (2) stairs/landing additions
Occupancy Permits
a) Miller Brothers Partnership – to convert beauty
shop at 29200 Evergreen Drive to residential apartments (2 units)
b) Brian Popp – To convert a jewelry shop to a
Therapeutic Massage Studio at 209A W. Main Street
Final Subdivision Plat
a) Stoneridge North (Ed Stone) – Reviewed revised restrictive covenants for the
subdivision and submitted comments to Attorney Wanasek
Temporary Permits
a) American Fireworks –Temporary fireworks sales
Variances
a) Jon Lennartz – 309 N. Rochester Street –
Rochester Zoning Board of appeals approving the at their January 27, 2011 public
hearing meeting
Notice of Zoning Violations that were Corrected:
Randall & Michelle Barwick - Failure to obtain a zoning permit for
stairs/landing. Citation issued to owner on December 11, 2009. Randy Barwick
appeared in Racine County Circuit Court on January 19, 2011 and was found guilty
for failure to obtain a zoning permit. Randy Barwick was ordered to obtain a
zoning permit from Rochester Zoning Administrator within 30 days. Randy Barwick
applied for a zoning permit for the stairs/landing on 02/19/2011 and was issued
the zoning permit on 02/23/2011.
Gregory Tomasek – Sent notice of violation to the property for the placements of
additions to an existing non conforming residence, addition to an existing
storage shed and for the construction of a framed canvas carport without first
obtaining variance and zoning permits approval from the Village of Rochester.
Mr. Tomasek removed the portable canvas car port from the property and removed
the two (2) first floor additions(front “& side) from existing residence and the
addition placed on the existing storage shed. Zoning permits were issued on
January 5, 2011.
Notice of Violation that have been granted an extension of time to comply:
Raymond & Marjean Richardson – Sent notice of violation to the property owner
for failure to comply with the conditions of his variance approval granted by
Racine County Zoning Board of Adjustment, on 11/1/1983. Property owner has
contacted the Village Zoning Administrator and will be sending a letter by
December 2, 2010, outlining how they will correct their violation. The Village
Zoning Administrator sent a letter to the property owners and their attorney,
granting them an extension of time until June 1, 2011 to correct the violations
that exists on their property.
Notice of violation that has been sent:
Justin Hanson – 613 Hwy DD – Parcel # 176031918235000 -Conducting a roofing &
home improvement business on his property that is presently zoned R-2, Suburban
Residential District (Unsewered). The Zoning Administrator sent a notice of
violation on March 14, 2011.
Citations:
Dionn Dassow –Requested that Tony Castillo, Racine County Sherriff’s Department
Deputy issue a citation to Mr. Dassow for failure to obtain a zoning permit for
the construction of a roof over his existing stockpile of firewood. Mr. Dassow
received a notice of violation from the Village of Rochester in December of 2009
outlining this same and removed the roof over the stockpile of firewood. Mr.
Dassow has been informed by the building inspector and by me that he needs to
obtain building/zoning permits prior to construction.
Ordinance Committee Meeting:
Met with the Ordinance committee on February 21, 2011 and submitted
recommendations relating to the proposed commercial residential districts to
incorporate into Chapter 15 (planning & Zoning) of the Village of Rochester
Municipal code. Next meeting is scheduled March 21, 2011, at which time we will
be discussing proposed commercial zoning districts to incorporate into Chapter
15 (Planning & Zoning) of the Rochester Municipal Code.
Historic Preservation Committee:
a) Obtain approval for the second story
stairs/landing for Chances Restaurant & Bar.
b) Obtain approval for the advertising signs to be
placed at the Therapeutic Massage Studio
Items scheduled for the March 24, 2011, Village Zoning Board of appeals:
a) Welke Brothers Farm Partnership – Requesting a
variance to place a farm machine shed on his property without the presence of a
principal structure on the lot. Property is located at 35507 Washington Avenue
and is immediately west of the Honey Creek Cemetery.
Building Inspection Department. Greivell reported twenty- one permits for the
months of January through March. Seven building and fourteen mechanical. There
were no new homes.
T.E.A.M. (Teen – Education – Awareness- Mentors) Program Presentation
and discussion regarding student opportunities in Village Government: Seth
Kuranz, Racine County Youth Coalition; Teens: Lauren Wolfson; Carly Barnhardt;
Phil Davis
Seth Kuranz addressed the Board. Seth stated that he is the Coalition
Coordinator for the Racine County Youth Coalition. One of their roles is
to support positive youth development projects.
A few years ago an organization was developed called Wisconsin Youth Voice which
promotes engaging young people in community decisions. Racine County Youth
Coalition, Partners Too and T.E.A.M. partnered together to see what Youth Voice
might look like in Racine County. They since have been able to establish teens
sitting on the City of Burlington and Town of Burlington Boards. The teens have
an advisory vote on all matters that come before the boards. They also have
young people in the Waterford and Burlington Chamber of Commerce who give input
and advice on youth issues that come before those bodies. They have worked with
the local school boards to involve teens in the decision making process of
policies in the school environment. These all share a common theme in bringing
young people to the table to encourage communication with the decision makers.
Carly Barnhardt, a sophomore at WUHS addressed the Board to explain the assets
of T.E.A.M. Assets are qualities and characteristics that young people have to
gear them to success ladder in life. They are divided into internal assets and
external assets. Internal is what drives young people and external is what
influences them such as their parents, teachers or community leaders that
ultimately influence their internal drive. One of the more
shocking statistics that they realized from a poll that was taken last year is
that only 15% of young adults feel that their opinion matters to adults. She
feels that giving young people a voice to express on what’s going on in their
community will give them a feeling of self worth. It will also give an
opportunity to give a unique perspective which will ultimately bring the
community together to work towards common goals.
Phil Davis, a sophomore at WUHS addressed the Board next to talk about the
benefits involving teens in community decisions. He feels that they can give
insight into the average teen life. If they have the opportunity to work with
community leaders they can benefit the community with the ideas they bring
forward.
Lauren Wolfson, a sophomore at WUHS addressed the Board next to explain the
aspects of a teens voice on the Board. She feels if there is a teen voice on the
Board, they most likely will come back after college and feel like they have a
purpose in their community.
Seth stated there are definitely benefits and challenges to involving teens in
the community. As a coalition they have worked on this issue with local
businesses, communities and schools. They have worked through some of the
challenges and they have some good ideas of processes that work. It is a project
that they truly believe and hope that Rochester would be open to the idea.
After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board that teens could be a
benefit in certain areas of the Village and are welcome to attend the meetings.
Beere encouraged them to take a look at the Village website or call the Village
hall to see when the meetings are and what committees they would be interested
in.
Application for conditional Use to place an asphalt batch plant at 31844
Washington Avenue (Parkview Sand & Gravel) Applicants: Robert Kordus, Asphalt
Contractors, Inc. Owner: Parkview Sand & Gravel LLC Parcel ID#’s
176031903021000/176031903025000/176031903028000
Schattner displayed a site map showing the proposed location of the asphalt
plant. He explained that the application was heard by the Plan Commission
on March 7, 2011 to locate the plant on 6.45 acres within the existing Parkview
Sand & Gravel quarry site. M-4 zoning allows this as a conditional
use. It was their recommendation to approve the application with the conditions
he proposed plus a couple of other conditions.
Weinkauf questioned Kordus how old the machine was the he will be using to
operate the asphalt plant. Kordus stated that it is a combination of multiple
machines, it was a machine that was used by Matthews Construction and some of
the parts range from 1966-2010. They will continue do update as needed in
compliance with DNR standards.
Beck questioned Kordus that this is listed as a portable plant, what is his
intention as far as the duration of the plant. Kordus stated that as long as
Parkview is there he would like to be there.
Bennett questioned what the truck traffic is that will be generated by this
asphalt plant. Kordus replied, at maximum capacity there could be nine trucks an
hour leaving the plant. However, he expects it to be only one to two trucks an
hour most of the time. It’s impossible for him to speculate any more than that.
It basically depends on the job at hand. There may be days where the plant
doesn’t run at all.
Discussion was held about the materials that are used in the asphalt plant.
Johnson, stated that there is a concern of how much water he is going to use,
the emissions he will be producing and if he will have a Wisconsin Discharge
Elimination Permit System permit. Kordus responded by saying he will not be
using any water. He expressed that the DNR monitors what comes out of the stacks
and the machine he will be using already has a stack emission record that is in
compliance with the WDNR standards. His plant, when
operational, will only produce 500 lbs. of particulate matter a day he compared
it to a Chinese restaurant that produces 350 lbs. it is well below DNR
standards.
There was a concern raised about smell and noise. Kordus stated that they will
work diligently to add product to the asphalt to control odors. The product that
he is referring to is called Equisorb. A collection system will also be
installed that will capture the odors and burn them. As far as the noise, the
plant will produce less noise than the crusher that is located on the property.
It produces 60 decibels; you can basically talk over it, in addition, the noise
will be masked by the bowl they are located in.
Gail Baierlipp, 304 E. Fox St. expressed concern about ground water
contamination from the chemicals that go into the asphalt. Kordus stated that
they buy there liquid asphalt already processed. The product goes from a tanker
into the tank which is when the Equisorb is added. There are no other chemicals
or product that they add. If it rains and there is dust on the equipment that
dust might get to the ground. He added that they will be paving around the
entire plant and they will control all the water to stay on site. He said
there are existing monitoring wells out there and they will continue to test
them yearly. They will also test the silt run off ponds. The tests will then be
forwarded to the Village to keep on record. Schattner pointed out annual well
testing is a requirement of Parkview’s conditional use permit. Schattner stated
for the benefit of the Board, he added a condition the oil storage must be
surrounded by a berm with certain specifications.
Another brief discussion was held about truck traffic and the speed of the
trucks. Residents were informed to contact the clerk’s and/or the sheriff’s
department when they observe these traffic issues. Increased speed enforcement
to the area should help correct this.
Baierlipp also expressed concern about how property values are affected by
properties that are near asphalt plants. Kordus stated that he is an investor
and owns 15 properties and has found no evidence that property values are
affected by asphalt plants. The reason why he chose this site is because zoning
allows for it and it is located in a gravel pit, and it’s relatively in the
country.
Bennett moved, 2nd by Chart to grant approval of the conditional use permit
application to place an asphalt batch plant at 31844 Washington Avenue subject
to recommendations of the Plan Commission at the March 7, 2011 meeting and the
recommended conditions of the zoning administrator. Motion carried.
Application for Special Permit to keep chickens at 607 Stephanie Street:
Christie Hall
Birkett received an application from Christie Hall to keep chickens for a 4-H
project at her residence of 607 Stephanie St. Birkett reported that he met with
Christi and went over their site and plan to keep the chickens. After reviewing,
he recommends that the board grant her the Special Exemption Animal Permit.
Christi Hall addressed the Board. She explained that she would like to keep
three hens for a 4-H project on her property. She said that the pen would be
kept behind her neighbors’ garage and would only be visible from her house. The
chickens would be contained at all times. She received signatures from some her
neighbors saying that they do not object.
Chart commented that while he supports 4-H, he feels that by allowing chickens
in a residential area it could open up more requests from others to have such
animals in a residential district and once you allow it for one you have to
allow it for others. Weinkauf agreed; he feels that is what zoning is for, to
determine what is acceptable in agricultural and residential areas.
Gail Baierlipp, 304 E. Fox St., commented that the DNR regulations state that
chickens be kept 50 ft. from any well and questioned if she would be in
compliance with that. Christie stated that the pens would be kept at least that
far from the well if not more.
Johnson moved, 2nd by Bennett to grant a Special Animal Permit to Christie Hall
to raise no more than three chickens at 607 Stephanie St. for the purpose of a
4-H project. Votes are recorded as follows: Beere – Aye; Bennett – Aye; Johnson
– Aye; Weinkauf – Nay; Beck – Nay; Chart – Nay; Lancour – Aye. Motion was
carried.
Request for Extension on Raze Order: Ouwens Property; 208 S. Front
Street
There was no one in the audience there to represent the owner. A letter was
provided from the attorney of the property owner stating that the sale of the
property was moving forward and that he is asking for a brief extension of the
raze order so they may complete the sale.
Discussion was held. Some board members felt that the property owners have had
ample time to do something with the property. Chart was concerned whether or not
the potential buyer was aware of the property line issues associated with this
property. Schattner stated that he received a call from the potential buyer and
he is aware of the issue. Board members felt that someone should be present to
represent the property owner.
After discussion, Beck moved, 2nd by Weinkauf to table this issue until the next
board on April 11, 2011 at which time they will take definite action on the
property. Votes are recorded as follows: Beere – Aye; Bennett – Nay;
Johnson – Aye; Weinkauf – Aye; Beck – Aye; Chart – Aye; Lancour – Aye. Motion
carried.
Resolution #2011-2 to Impose a Special Charge on Tax Parcel
176031911009020 for Current Services on Property in the Village of Rochester
Jim Hurst addressed the Board. He stated that Milgate Development has paid the
Village of Rochester over $32, 000 in engineering and attorney fees over the
past four years to develop a nine acre site. He stated that he is not disputing
the fees he is fully aware that he owes them; however, there has been an ongoing
issue between Milgate Development and The Settlement. He said that the Village,
The Settlement and Milgate Development entered into an agreement for Milgate to
extend the sewer to The Settlement from his property.
Milgate was supposed to be reimbursed for the expenses of installing the sewer.
It has been four years and he has gotten nothing. He asked the Village to access
the line of credit for The Settlement to reimburse him. He hired attorneys and
put a lien on the property, however the property went into foreclosure so his
liens are now no good because of that process. He never would have done it if
the Village hadn’t agreed to reimburse him through the Settlements line of
credit if The Settlement didn’t reimburse him.
Hurst further explained that he was in agreement to install the laterals to the
sewer which he was to split the expenses with The Settlement, but because of the
drawings and inspection, the drawings showed 240 ft. and the inspector made them
install 240 ft. of laterals; it was only supposed to be 24 ft.; so there were
additional expenses to install the 240 ft. It was an oversight he feels from
engineering and construction. But he maintains that the Village was going to
reimburse him through the Settlements line of credit.
Beck stated that this is first they have heard of it. Hurst stated this was
agreed upon with the previous Village Board, however, the Village Attorney came
back and said that the line of credit was for Phase I and the laterals that were
installed are in Phase II. Tierney agreed that there was an agreement. He stated
that it might be a
misconception on the attorney’s part because she is now aware that the letter of
credit did include sewer that went in to Phase II. He feels that he needs to
discuss this with Marcy. Tierney stated that the way the agreement was
structured is that Milgate had a quote to put in the sewers and the two
developers were going to split it, the agreement also stated that if there were
any extras the two developers were to get together and come up with another
agreement. That didn’t happen because RJM Builders walked away from the
development. At this point the Village is trying to close out The Settlement and
he feels that this should be tabled for a month so that he can discuss this with
Marcy.
After discussion, Beck moved, 2nd by Lancour to table the resolution until next
month and direct the attorney and the engineer to clear this matter up in a
timely manner. Motion carried.
Report on Racine County Animal Control Meeting
Birkett reported that he and Betty Novy attended a County-wide meeting on March
10, 2011. He reported that the meeting was well attended by representatives from
most of the municipalities. Speakers included Milwaukee County Animal Control,
DATPC and Wisconsin Human Society. He reported that meeting focused on getting
background of pertinent state statues, Milwaukee County’s current animal control
and how we could partner with a humane society.
The attendees decided that it would be beneficial to meet on a monthly basis.
The next meeting will be held at Racine County’s Ives Grove meeting room on
Thursday, April 14, 2011.
The goal is to come up with a countywide solution, whether it’s one large
organization, or smaller regions in the county working under an umbrella
organization. Betty and Chris both feel that it is important that Rochester
stays involved with the process as it moves forward.
Exterior Façade Improvements: Rochester Municipal Building
Novy explained in a note to the Board that while formulating the budget last
year $10,000 was budgeted to address some concerns for the Municipal Building,
such as exterior painting, replacing the south doors, improvements to the front
façade and replacement of furnace and/or AC. She asked the Board for direction
as to what levels of improvements to pursue.
Birkett explained that the building is need of tuck-point and paint. The two
south doors on the building are rotted and need replacement. He stated that they
are not secure. He also stated that it would look better for Main St. if some
kind of improvements were made. Chris provided one quote of $5,952 from Jacob
Andrews Construction for exterior painting, stucco and replacement of the two
south doors.
Consensus of the Board was not to spend a lot of money on the building. Beck
stated that although he doesn’t think they should spend a lot of money he does
feel that some kind of improvements should be made.
After discussion it was agreed that Birkett, should get more quotes on exterior
painting and replacement of the two south doors. Schattner added that if the
building is painted, the Village would have to go through an approval process
from the Historic Preservation District.
Racine County Emergency Management: Emergency Operations Plan Update
Swan explained that Racine County forwarded a NIMS compliant template to use for
the Villages’ Emergency Operations Plan. Swan performed some initial
customization work; however the plan still needs to be gone through and
decisions have to be made to fit the plan for the Village of Rochester.
After some discussion, Beere requested that a special meeting with David Mack be
scheduled to walk them through the plan.
Appoint Members and Determine Date for Board of Review
Chart moved, 2nd by Weinkauf to appoint Johnson, Bennett and Weinkauf as the
Board of Review members along with Paul Beere, Village President and Betty Novy,
Clerk and to hold Board of Review on Thursday May 26, 2011. Motion carried.
Re-schedule May 9, 2011 regular Board Meeting
The IIMC Municipal Clerks Conference is being held the week of May 9th and Betty
and Sandi are registered for the event. The Board meeting would normally be held
on that meeting. After light discussion consensus of the Board was to try to
hold it either the same night as the Plan Commission meeting on May 2nd or the
day after the Plan Commission meeting on May 3rd. Clerk Novy and Swan to check
to see which one will work.
Correction and/or approval: 2011 Spring Newsletter
There were no corrections suggested. Chart moved, 2nd by Bennett to approve the
2011 Spring Newsletter for publishing. Chart moved, 2nd be Bennett to approve.
Motion carried.
Correspondence was read from Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Plan Commission:
Transmittal of Adopted Comprehensive Plan for the Town of East Troy; Super Board
Meeting Announcement/Agenda: Tuesday, March 22, 2011; League of Municipalities:
New Official Workshops and Regional Dinner Meeting Invites; Local Government
Institute of WI: April 28, 2011 Workshop – Doing More With Less; Atty: Todd
Terry regarding recent case work with Jon Schattner & Lee Greivell.
Committee Reports:
Public Works Committee: Birkett reported that there was not a
meeting held in March. There is a meeting scheduled for April.
Ordinance Committee: Beck reported that the Committee met with
Jon Schattner and went over recommendations for the Residential Zoning
Districts.
Honey Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District Board:
Weinkauf reported that the Board received a letter from the DNR asking that the
HLPR hire an engineer to perform a dam failure analysis even though one was done
a few years ago. It will cost the district approximately $3,800 have the
analysis done.
Western Racine County Health Department: Bennett reported that
there was not a meeting held in February. There is a meeting scheduled for the
end of March.
Village Hall Building Committee Chart reported that the
Committee asked four of the Construction Manager firms to resubmit bids to
include architectural services. Anderson Ashton included architectural services
in their original bid and the committee wanted to be able to compare apples to
apples when deciding. The four firms will be interviewed at their next meeting
on March 28, 2011. Chart explained that the Committee drew names to determine
the order of the interviews. They will be interviewed in the following order:
1. The Peter Scherrer Group
2. Selzer-Ornst Co. Construction Services
3. Anderson Ashton, Inc.
4. Scherrer Construction Co., Inc.
Finance Committee Beck reported the recommendations of the
committee to approve all disbursements listed on the check detail dated February
15 – March 14, 2011. Bennett moved, 2nd by Chart to approve the finance
committee’s recommendations. Motion carried.
Bennett moved, 2nd by Johnson to adjourn at 9:55 p.m. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Sandi Swan, Deputy Clerk Treasurer, WCMC