February 1, 2010
PLAN COMMISSION
7:00 p.m.
Mike Weinkauf called the
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Paul Beere, Maureen Eckert, Chris Johnson,
James Joseph, Tom Rowntree and Mark Tamblyn present.
Jonathan Schattner, Zoning
Administrator, and Betty Novy, Clerk-Treasurer were also present.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Joseph moved, 2nd by Eckert
to approve the minutes of the January 4, 2010 meeting.
Motion carried.
Pubic Hearings:
There were none.
Action Items:
Conceptual Proposal to construct a Veterinarian
Clinic, Dog Grooming and Doggie Day Care establishment on an empty lot on the SE
corner of English Settlement Avenue. (CTH J) and State Highway 36 (STH 36)
Owners:
Mike & Kim Rosenthal
Applicant:
Dr. Sandra Miller, Creature Comforts Veterinary Service
Tax ID#176031911011020
Schattner presented his
zoning review comments, dated January 28, 2010, to accommodate the proposed use
of this property. He indicated the
property would have to be rezoned B-3 “Commercial Service District”.
This zoning is consistent with its Land Use Plan classification “Urban
Reserve”. A land use plan amendment
would not be required.
Jim Hurst, Commercial
Construction Consultants, presented a proposed site plan showing a 3,000 square
foot veterinarian clinic with proposed use of the first floor for veterinarian
and small retail services. The
exposed lower level is proposed to be utilized for grooming and doggie day care
services. An 11,000 square foot
fenced area, to be utilized as a dog run, would project from the southern end of
the building. The lot is
buffered on the east by a berm, and to the south by a heavily wooded area.
There was discussion
regarding the noise of barking dogs.
However, it was noted highway noise from State Highway 36 would likely drown out
any such noises. Dr.
Miller indicated dogs would only be on site during day-time work hours and would
be rotated outdoors. The only time
an animal would stay overnight is if a surgical procedure required observation
for that period of time.
Schattner noted fencing
surrounding the dog run would have to be dealt with as a conditional use in the
B-3 zoning district.
Plan Commissioners made the
following comments regarding the proposed use:
Dr. Miller requested
clarification on this item. It was
clarified that development of parcels to the east of the subject parcel will
likely require public sewer to be extended.
It was also noted that no immediate plans exist.
Plan Commissioners stated no
immediate objections to the proposed use.
A more detailed plan must be submitted for formal review, along with an
application for re-zoning and conditional use.
The driveway/ access point was noted as the biggest concern.
Further investigation should be made with Racine County to determine what
will be allowable.
Application to place temporary Real Estate
Marketing Sign on the NW corner of English Settlement Ave. (CTH J) and State
Highway 36 (STH 36)
Owners:
The Equitable Bank
Applicant:
Michael Schiltz, Cornerstone Development
Tax Id#176031911320020
Schattner presented his
zoning review comments, dated January 28, 2010, to accommodate this request.
He recommended placement of the sign be granted subject to numerous
conditions, including a two year time limit, at the end of which the Plan
Commission could require an update on the project and possibly allow an
extension.
Jon Senkerik, Cornerstone
Development, addressed the Commission.
Senkerik commented the proposed location of the sign was checked by an
engineer. It was verified to be
outside of the vision triangle of the intersection.
He noted the proposal includes removal of existing signs.
There was discussion about
the unusual geometry of the intersection of State Highway 36 and County Highway
J. It was noted a flat sign would
not be easily visible to travelers along State Highway 36.
A two-faced V-shaped sign was determined to be most visible for traffic
heading in either direction.
Beere moved, 2nd
by Johnson to approve a temporary 4-foot by 8-foot V-shaped freestanding sign,
visible from both sides, subject to the recommendations and approval of the
zoning administrator. Motion
carried.
Conceptual Plan to revise
the previously approved layout of “The Settlement of Rochester”
condominium project
located at the intersection of English Settlement Ave. (CTH J) and Settlement
Dr.
Schattner presented his
zoning review comments dated January 28, 2010.
He noted presentation of two concept plans by the applicant, one titled
“Concept Plan” shows eighty-six units as originally approved by the Plan
Commission, and the other “Concept Plan Phase 3” shows an increase of ten
residential units for a total of ninety-six.
The plan labeled “Concept
Plan” seems to address most concerns of the Plan Commission that were heard at
the last meeting. The cul-de-sacs
off of Oak Hill Circle have been eliminated.
The streets have been returned to closely resemble the original layout of
the development and an entrance island has been placed at the connection of
Millgate Road. The proposed club
house was relocated northeast of the pond which exists next to the English
Settlement Avenue entrance.
The plan labeled “Concept
Plan Phase 3” includes the above stated changes, but also converts the
commercially zoned area to an additional twelve residential units.
Schattner noted this “Concept Plan Phase 3” would require Phase 3 to be
rezoned to “M-4” multiple family residential.
John Senkerik, Cornerstone
Development, addressed the Commission.
Senkerik displayed the originally approved layout of “The Settlement of
Rochester” for comparison. He noted
the biggest change from the last submittal was returning to the originally
approved layout. Twenty-five
off-street parking spaces are also returned.
The clubhouse was moved to
the commercial area. It was noted
that the clubhouse will be strictly for the condominium association to use for
assembly and events. A sales office
will also be located in the clubhouse until such time as all units are sold.
Senkerik questioned whether placement of the clubhouse in the commercial
area is allowable under that zoning designation.
Schattner stated his belief that it could be addressed as a conditional
use in the district.
Senkerik noted inclusion of
a landscaped island at the intersection of Millgate Drive and Oak Hill Circle to
signify to drivers that they are entering a private development.
The ADA trail has been relocated and lengthened so that it does not
exceed 5% slope at any point.
Units 35 through 39, as well as the additional ten homes proposed for “Concept
Plan Phase 3”, are replaced with a smaller housing product.
Cornerstone believes there is a significant market for these types of
homes.
Senkerik indicated they
could not accommodate the Plan Commission’s original request to replace
mountable curbs with vertical faced curbs.
In some instances, driveway entrances cannot be pre-determined.
Mountable curbs are the best way to address that.
Senkerik reported on consultations with a driveway paving contractor and
geotechnical engineer regarding the failure of existing mountable curbs.
Both individuals believe the curbs deteriorated so badly because of
improper curing.
Senkerik indicated
Cornerstone’s preference for changing the commercial out lots to residential
use. Cornerstone believes
residential units adjacent to commercial out lots will be hard to sell because
buyers will be worried about what type of commercial entities will locate there.
Renate Greeley, Shorewest Realtors, was present as the realtor
representing the condominium development.
She concurred residential properties are difficult to sell when adjacent
to vacant commercial lots.
There was discussion about
the feasibility of maintaining the commercial outlots.
Specifically noted was whether it was fair to condominium owners to be
responsible for maintaining the portion of condominium roads that would service
those lots. The possibility of
re-designating that portion as public road was discussed and whether setbacks
and road right of way could be accommodated within the current layout.
Tom Iverson, 403 Oak Hill
Circle, was present representing existing condominium owners.
He indicated preference of the current condominium owners that the
commercial lots be re-designated residential.
However, he also indicated unit ownership cannot increase or decrease
without consent of the existing homeowners.
He notified Plan Commissioners that Cornerstone Development had not yet
come to an agreement with the existing condominium owners on several issues.
Plan Commissioners had mixed
feelings regarding retaining the commercial outlots.
Ultimately, it was decided that Cornerstone needs to come to agreement
with the existing condominium owners before the direction of those lots can be
decided. Because those lots are
located in Phase 3, conceptual approval of modifications to Phase 2 can move
forward.
Iverson was asked to update
the Village when the condominium owners and bank reach an agreement as to the
build-out of the development.
Tamblyn moved, 2nd
by Joseph to approve the conceptual layout of Phase 1 and 2 contingent on the
ability of a conditional use to accommodate the clubhouse at the proposed
location, on the engineer moving the eastern boundary line of Phase 2, if
needed, to match the eastern boundary of Oak Hill Circle where it abuts Phase 3,
and subject to the zoning administrator’s recommendations.
Motion carried.
Tamblyn moved, 2nd
by Rowntree to table action on Phase 3.
Motion carried.
Tamblyn, 2nd by
Eckert to adjourn at 9:02 p.m.
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Betty J. Novy, CMC
Planning Secretary